New recipes

Tort D and T

Tort D and T

Countertop: We prepare it the night before, the next day it is cut much better. The egg whites with a pinch of salt mix well until we get a hard foam. Mix the yolks with the sugar until the sugar melts, add the ground walnuts and sifted flour. Mix well, then add the beaten egg whites, with slow movements from bottom to top, add the egg whites. Wallpaper a cake form with a diameter of 28 cm, with baking paper, put the composition in the form and then put it in the preheated oven, it is ready when it passes the toothpick test. Remove from the oven and leave to cool until the next day.

Syrup: Bring the sugar water to a boil, when it starts to boil, remove from the heat and add the rum essence. Leave to cool.

Cream: Put mascarpone in a bowl and mix with duocreme until well blended.

We also prepare the krant in the evening, about 200 g of caramelized sugar, add about 200 g of walnuts, mix well and spread on a bottom greased with oil, let it cool ... I made a little more to eat some krantanit, I have used only 150 g of krant, which I crushed in a food processor and mixed with well-beaten sour cream.

From the sugar paste I cut the popcorn of various sizes and colors, I let them dry until the next day.

Assembly: Divide the cake top into three, place the first part on a plate, syrup well, spread part of the cream, then place the sour cherries, after removing the seeds, place the second sheet, syrup, spread the sour cream and cherries , at the end we place the third sheet, we syrup it and we spread the rest of the cream. We cover the edge of the cake with the mixture of whipped cream and krant. Melt the chocolate on a steam bath and then garnish. Place the popcorn in the sugar paste on top.



Examples of use of the word "wrong" in the literature

Those who waste their sensitivity wrong and through don't have any more when you need them.

Milan Kundera, Jacques and his master

She goes on a little further "I don't know, maybe it's an idea, but I was a little embarrassed, I wonder if you didn't have cake. "It suddenly becomes brutal." Cake ? Cake with Martereau? What are you looking for?

Nathalie Sarraute, Martereau

My uncle, said Antonio, you are right and you are right cake. Gina is right and she is cake. You always have to tell her she has cake. The rest of the story is in that one.

Jean Giono, The song of the world

You don't know me, you have cake to love me. I love you, I can't do anything about it, said Françoise with a smile. You have cake, repeated Xavière in a sob.

Simone de Beauvoir, The guest

It is the supreme glare that rises.
Bend over, the work of twenty centuries has cake.
Progress, vile serpent, in the mud twists

Victor Hugo, The Terrible Year

I hope this article doesn't get you too confused and dispel your doubts about the spelling of the phrase "being wrong." By replacing with the imperfect, you should no longer make spelling mistakes. Do not hesitate to consult our other articles on the small spelling rules of the French language.


Rolled cake with carrots and caramel

Although it may seem strange to use carrots for dessert, its sweetness combined with cinnamon and nutmeg goes great! I chose to customize the classic carrot cake a bit, to please me after trying the recipe. In addition, it looks very appetizing and I recommend you share it with your family.

Wheat ingredient:
  • 150 grams of flour
  • a baking powder
  • a teaspoon of cinnamon
  • a quarter teaspoon of nutmeg
  • orange essence
  • 180 grams of sugar
  • 100 grams of oil
  • 2 eggs
  • 50 grams of walnuts
  • 30 grams of cranberries
  • 250 grams of grated carrot
Method of preparation:

I mixed the dry ingredients: flour, baking powder, cinnamon, nutmeg. Then I beat the sugar and oil with a mixer until a fluffy cream resulted and I added the eggs one by one. I sifted all the dry ingredients into the cream and mixed slowly with a silicone spatula. At the end I added finely chopped walnuts, cranberries and grated carrots on a small grater and I perfumed everything with orange essence.

I lined a rectangular tray with baking paper, emptied the cream and then baked it at 180 ° C for about 30 minutes. When I took the tray out of the oven I took the baking paper off the counter and with the help of a kitchen towel I started to roll the counter slowly, carefully, without forcing and breaking it. Then I let it cool.

Caramel Cream Ingredients:
  • 80 grams of sugar
  • 60 grams of liquid cream
  • a few almonds
  • 2-3 skewer sticks

Before making the caramel cream, I dipped a few almonds in the burnt sugar to use later for decoration. I used a few skewer sticks on top of which I lightly pushed an almond. Be careful not to force it because the almond can break in two. Then I put the sugar in a pot and put it on medium heat, stirring until the sugar has completely melted. I took the skewer stick, rolled the almond in the burnt sugar and then held it with the tip pointing down to drain the excess burnt sugar. I repeated the process until I got some almonds for decoration. Then I reheated the burnt sugar and when it started to boil, I carefully poured the liquid cream and after a minute I took the pot off the heat. I strained the caramel sauce and let it cool in the fridge, and then I took the top out of the towel and soaked it in half of the caramel cream.

Cream Ingredients:
  • 150 grams of cream cheese
  • 50 grams of powdered sugar
  • 200 milliliters of whipped cream
  • a teaspoon of vanilla essence
Method of preparation

I mixed the cream cheese with the powdered sugar with the help of a mixer, and then I gradually added the liquid cream, until a fluffy cream resulted and I flavored everything with vanilla. To finish the cake, I spread half of the cream on the counter and rolled it. I used the other half to decorate the outside. Over the cream cheese, with the help of a spoon, I zig-zagged the remaining caramel cream, and in the middle of the roll I sprinkled chopped walnuts and arranged the almonds in burnt sugar nicely.


Passion fruit cake, white chocolate and whipped cream

For 10 years now, on December 26 every year we celebrate Mihai's birthday, however, in the heat of Christmas shopping I forgot to go on the list and buy some ingredients, so I had to do what I had a cake for lovers, because it wasn't his fault that I forgot to buy one, another. This is how this Passion Fruit Cake, white chocolate and whipped cream appeared, which in the end was an extremely light and tasty cake.

vanilla seeds and pods

juice from half a lemon

Almond flakes and chocolate flakes

I put the biscuits and butter in the robot and mixed them well until they were homogenous, then I put the mixture in a cake tin and put it in the fridge to cool.

In a small pot I put the liquid cream with the sugar, the seeds and the vanilla pod on the fire and I let them boil over a low heat.

Then I added the core of the passion fruit, 100g of white chocolate broken into pieces, gelatin sheets soaked in cold water and squeezed well, the juice of half a lemon and I took the pot off the heat.

I strained all this mixture through a fine sieve, passing the seeds from the passion fruit well, in order to remove all the aroma.

When the mixture cooled, I added it over the cookie sheet and put it in the fridge.

Before serving the cake, I garnished it with lightly fried almond flakes and a few dark chocolate flakes.


Kinder Pingui cake recipe

Kinder Pingui cake is a sensational homemade cake with a fluffy top, fine cream with whipped cream, honey and condensed milk. It is a simple cake if we talk about its preparation but at the same time complex in terms of taste.

Kinder Pingui cake it is a perfect dessert, much better than the commercial cake. Just like the Kinder Sliced ​​Milk Cake, Kinder Pingui it is a creamy and special dessert. What is the difference between the two homemade cakes?

    is a cake with two fluffy tops and a layer of aromatic and fine cream with cheese, condensed milk and whipped cream. See how to make a kinder slice of milk cake!
  • Kinder Pingui cake it is double the slice of milk, literally and figuratively. It consists of two fluffy countertops with cocoa, satin cream with honey, whipped cream and condensed milk. From any angle, the two cakes are perfect, one better than the other. All you have to do is try them and see which one you like best.

Before I move on to the Kinder Pingui recipe, I want to leave you with some helpful recipes & # 8211 quick homemade condensed milk recipe and homemade vanilla extract recipe. I am sure that these two recipes will be useful because not all brands of condensed milk on the market are suitable for cakes and desserts, they do not have the right consistency and are not found in any store. As for the vanilla extract, we have presented you two extremely easy and economical recipes. In fact, it is much more than that because you need vanilla pods that you have already used and you would normally throw them in the trash.

Therefore, we immediately move on to the recipe and how to prepare the Kinder Pingui cake. But I have a few details to do before, for the countertop I used a 43 & # 21528 cm tray and I cut the resulting countertop in two. You have another option, you can use the 35/25 tray and bake a countertop to cut in half or bake two countertops.


Sweets recipes for diabetics

Seven years ago, the husband Andreea Perchik was diagnosed with diabetes. This change meant a new diet for the whole family.

"It simply came to our notice then that diabetes was not the end of the road. What I would like all diabetics to know: There is no hole in the sky that you are diagnosed with diabetes. It can be easily controlled by proper nutrition, by a healthy lifestyle ", says Andreea.

For all people with diabetes, the hardest part is giving up sweets.

"It was a shock to my husband when he found out he had diabetes. He was crazy about chocolate ", he says Andreea Perchik.

"Sweet taste is addictive and then it's hard for anyone to give up sweet taste altogether," he says. Dr. Simona Carniciu, doctor for diabetes, nutrition and metabolic diseases.

But diabetes does not mean giving up sweets for good. There are other sweeteners besides sugar. Among the artificial ones, aspartame, saccharin and cyclamate are approved by the most important world forums, but at the same time there are enough studies that incriminate them for the appearance of some diseases.

"We must avoid as much as possible to bring substances that we are not sure of their effects, especially in the long term, but what is natural, it is clear that it is thousands of years on the planet discovered or undiscovered," says Dr. Simona Carniciu.

ARTIFICIAL SUGAR SUBSTITUTES:

NATURAL SUGAR SUBSTITUTES:

Among the natural substitutes for sugar, xylitol it is the most controversial. Some doctors claim that it is natural, others that it is obtained by synthetic processes. And agave and corn syrups should be consumed with caution by diabetics, because they have a high amount of fructose. You can choose instead stevia extract.

"Stevia has a load of sweetening up to 200 more than sugar. Just like sugar, it tastes almost identical, meaning it doesn't bother me at all, it satisfies my sweet taste, we fool it, we don't have side effects ", says Dr. Simona Carniciu.

You just have to be more discriminating with the help you render toward other people. Andreea, for example, does not use exact quantities, but tastes every time she makes a cake.

"I thought I'd do it this apple cake and not with another filling, because apples are extremely good for diabetics. It is a neutral fruit, which the diabetic can eat without any problem ", she explains.

Cinnamon is equally suitable for diabetics.

Cinnamon lowers blood sugar levels, so at least a quarter teaspoon of cinnamon a day is recommended for any diabetic.

In the case of baked cakes, use sweeteners such as stevia extract. If you make cold desserts instead, you can also use honey.

"She is very healthy, she has some extraordinary properties, but we have a problem with carbohydrates and we know we are limited. A diabetic patient has a diet of 160-220, it depends, sometimes even more, on (grams of) carbohydrates, carbohydrates per day and then he must know how to divide them ", states Dr. Simona Carniciu.

Therefore, you shouldn't overdo it with honey either, but you can eat a slice of cake without any problems.

Although it is a little more expensive than the previous recipe, it can be used successfully at any festive meal, because it will look like a cake and not many will realize it's sweetener and not sugar.

You can make the base of the cake from a mixture of crushed biscuits and melted butter, which you put in the cold. While in the freezer, prepare the diet cheese, raisin and sweetener filling. Spread the cream over the counter and keep in the freezer for a few more hours, after which the cake can be eaten.

If you find it complicated, Andreea proposes a recipe that will be ready in less than 10 minutes: truffles with prunes and coconut flakes. First the plums must be kept in water for at least 30 minutes, then chopped in a food processor. When we have obtained the pasta from the dried fruits, we add grated coconut until we obtain a composition that will be easy to shape in the hand.

Andreea posts recipes for diabetics on www.reteteminunate.ro

Careful! No dessert, no matter how healthy, should be consumed in excess. Doctors also recommend that people with diabetes measure their blood sugar frequently.


Vanilla Cake Top & # 8211 secrets for the fluffiest Vanilla Cake Top

  • Beat eggs with salt powder until they triple in volume. Attention, the eggs must be at room temperature and the more we beat them they will incorporate more air.
  • Mix lightly with a spatula or spatula with wide movements from top to bottom, by inverting. Valid for when we add oil but also when it comes to adding flour.
  • The flour is added, gradually sifted, in small portions. This will help not to leave the composition, ie not to decrease in volume.

Cakes

Whether you are looking for a birthday cake or you want a delicious cake for a festive meal, you will find here various combinations for cakes, for all tastes.

Of all, chocolate cakes are my and my family's favorites, but even those who prefer a fruit cake will find something here to satisfy their tastes.

Cakes for children, with various anniversary themes, will delight the little ones, but also the big ones alike.

I would be happy to try all these cake recipes and tell me how they turned out!


Contents

Some things must be established by anyone who wants to sue in negligence. These are what are called the "elements" of negligence.

Most jurisdictions say that there are four elements to a negligence action: [5]

  1. duty: the defendant has a duty to others, including the plaintiff, to exercise reasonable care,
  2. breach: the defendant breaches that duty through an act or culpable omission,
  3. damages: as a result of that act or omission, the plaintiff suffers an injury, and
  4. causation: the injury to the plaintiff is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's act or omission.

Some jurisdictions narrow the definition down to three elements: duty, breach and proximately caused harm. [6] Some jurisdictions recognize five elements, duty, breach, actual cause, proximate cause, and damages. [6] However, at their heart, the various definitions of what constitutes negligent conduct are very similar.

Duty of care Edit

The legal liability of a defendant to a plaintiff is based on the defendant's failure to fulfill a responsibility, recognized by law, of which the plaintiff is the intended beneficiary. The first step in determining the existence of a legally recognized responsibility is the concept of an obligation or duty. In the tort of negligence the term used is duty of care [7]

The case of Donoghue v Stevenson [8] [1932] established the modern law of negligence, laying the foundations of the duty of care and the fault principle which, (through the Privy Council), have been adopted throughout the Commonwealth. May Donoghue and her friend were in a cafe in Paisley. The friend bought Mrs Donoghue a ginger beer float. She drank some of the beer and later poured the remainder over her ice-cream and was horrified to see the decomposed remains of a snail exit the bottle. Donoghue suffered nervous shock and gastro-enteritis, but did not sue the cafe owner, instead suing the manufacturer, Stevenson. (As Mrs Donoghue had not herself bought the ginger beer, the doctrine of privacy precluded a contractual action against Stevenson).

The Scottish judge, Lord MacMillan, considered the case to fall within a new category of delict (the Scots law nearest equivalent of tort). The case proceeded to the House of Lords, where Lord Atkin interpreted the biblical ordinance to 'love your neighbor' as a legal requirement to 'not harm your neighbor.' He then went on to define neighbor as "persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions that are called into question. "

In England the more recent case of Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] introduced a 'threefold test' for a duty of care. Harm must be (1) reasonably foreseeable (2) there must be a relationship of proximity between the plaintiff and defendant and (3) it must be ‘fair, just and reasonable’ to impose liability. However, these act as guidelines for the courts in establishing a duty of care much of the principle is still at the discretion of judges.

In Australia, Donoghue v Stevenson was used as a persuasive precedent in the case of Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (AKR) (1936). [9] This was a landmark case in the development of negligence law in Australia. [10]

Whether a duty of care is owed to psychiatric, as opposed to physical, harm was discussed in the Australian case of Tame v State of New South Wales Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002). [11] [12] Determining a duty for mental harm has now been subsumed into the Civil Liability Act 2002 in New South Wales. [13] The application of Part 3 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) was demonstrated in Wicks v SRA (NSW) Sheehan v SRA (NSW). [14]

Breach of duty Edit

Once it is established that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff / claimant, the matter of whether or not that duty was breached must be settled. [15] The test is both subjective and objective. The defendant who knowingly (subjective, which is totally based on observation and personal prejudice or view) exposes the plaintiff / claimant to a substantial risk of loss, breaches that duty. The defendant who fails to realize the substantial risk of loss to the plaintiff / claimant, which any reasonable person [objective, Which is totally based on ground facts and reality without any personal prejudice or point of view.] In the same situation would clearly have realized, also breaches that duty. [16] [17] However, whether the test is objective or subjective may depend upon the particular case involved.

There is a reduced threshold for the standard of care owed by children. In the Australian case of McHale v Watson, [18] McHale, a 9-year-old girl was blinded in one eye after being hit by the ricochet of a sharp metal rod thrown by a 12-year-old boy, Watson. The defendant child was held not to have the level of care to the standard of an adult, but of a 12-year-old child with similar experience and intelligence. Kitto J explained that a child’s lack of foresight is a characteristic they share with others at that stage of development. The same principle was demonstrated to exist in English law in Mullin v Richards. [19]

Certain jurisdictions, also provide for breaches where professionals, such as doctors, fail to warn of risks associated with medical treatments or procedures. Doctors owe both objective and subjective duties to warn and breach of either is sufficient to satisfy this element in a court of law. For example, the Civil Liability Act in Queensland outlines a statutory test incorporating both objective and subjective elements. [20] For example, an obstetrician who fails to warn a mother of complications arising from childbirth may be held to have breached their professional duty of care.

In the Donoghue v Stevenson, Lord Macmillan declared that "the categories of negligence are never closed" and in Dorset Yacht v Home Office it was held that the government had no immunity from suit when they negligently failed to prevent the escape of juvenile offenders who subsequently vandalized a boatyard. In other words, all members of society have a duty to exercise reasonable care toward others and their property. In the Bolton v. Stone (1951), [21] the House of Lords held that a defendant was not negligent if the damage to the plaintiff were not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of his conduct. In the case, a Miss Stone was struck on the head by a cricket ball while standing outside a cricket ground. Finding that no batsman would normally be able to hit a cricket ball far enough to reach a person standing as far away as was Miss Stone, the court held her claim would fail because the danger was not reasonably or sufficiently foreseeable. As stated in the opinion, ‘reasonable risk’ cannot be judged with the benefit of hindsight. [ citation needed ] In the Roe v Minister of Health, [22] Lord Denning said the past should not be viewed through rose colored spectacles, finding no negligence on the part of medical professionals accused of using contaminated medical jars, since contemporary standards would have indicated only a low possibility of medical jar contamination.

For the rule in the U.S., see: Calculus of negligence

Intention and / or malice Edit

Further establishment of conditions of intention or malice where applicable may apply in cases of gross negligence. [2. 3]

Causation Edit

In order for liability to result from a negligent act or omission, it is necessary to prove not only that the injury was caused by that negligence, but also that there is a legally sufficient connection between the act and the negligence.

Factual causation (actual cause) Edit

For a defendant to be held liable, it must be shown that the particular acts or omissions were the cause of the sustained loss or damage. [24] Although the notion sounds simple, the causation between one's breach of duty and the harm that results to another can at times be very complicated. The basic test is to ask whether the injury would have occurred 'but for', or without, the accused party's breach of the duty owed to the injured party. [25] [26] [27] In Australia, the High Court has held that the 'but for' test is not the exclusive test of causation because it cannot address a situation where there is more than one cause of damage. [26] When 'but for' test is not satisfied and the case is an exceptional one, a commonsense test ('Whether and Why' test) will be applied [28] Even more precisely, if a breaching party materially increases the risk of harm to another, then the breaching party can be sued to the value of harm that he caused.

Asbestos litigations which have been ongoing for decades revolve around the issue of causation. Interwoven with the simple idea of ​​a party causing harm to another are issues on insurance bills and compensations, which sometimes drove compensating companies out of business.

Legal causation (proximate cause) Edit

Sometimes factual causation is distinguished from 'legal causation' to avert the danger of defendants being exposed to, in the words of Cardozo, J., "liability in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class." [29] It is said a new question arises of how remote a consequence a person's harm is from another's negligence. We say that one’s negligence is ‘too remote’ (in England) or not a ‘proximate cause’ (in the U.S.) of another’s harm if one would ‘never’ reasonably foresee it happening. Note that a 'proximate cause' in U.S. terminology (to do with the chain of events between the action and the injury) should not be confused with the 'proximity test' under the English duty of care (to do with closeness of relationship). The idea of ​​legal causation is that if no one can foresee something bad happening, and therefore take care to avoid it, how could anyone be responsible? For instance, in Palsgraf v. Long Island Rail Road Co. [30] the judge decided that the defendant, a railway, was not liable for an injury suffered by a distant bystander. The plaintiff, Palsgraf, was hit by a coin-operated scale which toppled because of a fireworks explosion that fell on her as she waited on a train platform. The scales fell because of a far-away commotion but it was not clear that what type of commotion caused the scale to fall, either it was the explosion's effect or the confused movement of the terrified people. A train driver had run to help a man into a departing train. The man was carrying a package as he jogged to jump in the train door. The package had fireworks in it. The driver mishandled the passenger or his package, causing the package to fall. The fireworks slipped and exploded on the ground causing shockwaves to travel through the platform, which became the cause of commotion on platform, and as a consequence, the scales fell. [note 1] Because Palsgraf was hurt by the falling scales, she sued the train company who employed the conductor for negligence. [note 2]

The defendant train company argued it should not be liable as a matter of law, because despite the fact that they employed the employee, who was negligent, his negligence was too remote from the plaintiff's injury. On appeal, the majority of the court agreed, with four judges adopting the reasons, written by Judge Cardozo, that the defendant owed no duty of care to the plaintiff, because a duty was owed only to foreseeable plaintiffs. Three judges dissented, arguing, as written by Judge Andrews, that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff, regardless of foreseeability, because all men owe one another a duty not to act negligently.

Such disparity of views on the element of remoteness continues to trouble the judiciary. Courts that follow Cardozo's view have greater control in negligence cases. If the court can find that, as a matter of law, the defendant owed no duty of care to the plaintiff, the plaintiff will lose his case for negligence before having a chance to present to the jury. Cardozo's view is the majority view. However, some courts follow the position put forth by Judge Andrews. In jurisdictions following the minority rule, defendants must phrase their remoteness arguments in terms of proximate cause if they wish the court to take the case away from the jury.

Remoteness takes another form, seen in The Wagon Mound (No. 2). [31] The Wagon Mound was a ship in Sydney harbor. The ship leaked oil creating a slick in part of the harbor. The wharf owner asked the ship owner about the danger and was told he could continue his work because the slick would not burn. The wharf owner allowed work to continue on the wharf, which sent sparks onto a rag in the water which ignited and created a fire which burnt down the wharf. The Privy Council determined that the wharf owner 'intervened' in the causal chain, creating a responsibility for the fire which canceled out the liability of the ship owner.

In Australia the concept of remoteness, or proximity, was tested with the case of Jaensch v Coffey. [12] The wife of a policeman, Mrs Coffey suffered a nervous shock injury from the aftermath of a motor vehicle collision although she was not actually at the scene at the time of the collision. The court upheld that, in addition to it being reasonably foreseeable that his wife might suffer such an injury, it required that there be sufficient proximity between the plaintiff and the defendant who caused the collision. Here there was sufficient causal proximity. See also Kavanagh v Akhtar, [32] Imbree v McNeilly, [33] and Tame v NSW. [11]

Injury Edit

Even though there is breach of duty, and the cause of some injury to the defendant, a plaintiff may not recover unless he can prove that the defendant's breach caused a pecuniary injury. This should not be mistaken with the requirements that a plaintiff prove harm to recover. As a general rule, a plaintiff can only rely on a legal remedy to the point that he proves that he suffered a loss it was reasonably foreseeable. It means something more than pecuniary loss is a necessary element of the plaintiff's case in negligence. When damages are not a necessary element, a plaintiff can win his case without showing that he suffered any loss he would be entitled to nominal damages and any other damages according to proof. (See Constantine v Imperial Hotels Ltd [1944] KB]).

Negligence is different in that the plaintiff must prove his loss, and a particular kind of loss, to recover. In some cases, a defendant may not dispute the loss, but the requirement is significant in cases where a defendant cannot deny his negligence, but the plaintiff suffered no pecuniary loss as a result even though he had suffered emotional injury or damage but he cannot be compensated for these kind of losses. The plaintiff can be compensated for emotional or non-pecuniary losses on the condition that If the plaintiff can prove pecuniary loss, then he can also obtain damages for non-pecuniary injuries, such as emotional distress.

The requirement of pecuniary loss can be shown in a number of ways. A plaintiff who is physically injured by allegedly negligent conduct may show that he had to pay a medical bill. If his property is damaged, he could show the lost income because he could not use it, the cost to repair it, although he could only recover for one of these things.

The damage may be physical, purely economic, both physical and economic (loss of earnings following a personal injury, [34]) or reputational (in a defamation case).

In English law, the right to claim for purely economic loss is limited to a number of 'special' and clearly defined circumstances, often related to the nature of the duty to the plaintiff as between clients and lawyers, financial advisers, and other professions where money is central to the consultative services.

Emotional distress has been recognized as an actionable tort. Generally, emotional distress damages had to be parasitic. That is, the plaintiff could recover for emotional distress caused by injury, but only if it accompanied a physical or pecuniary injury.

A claimant who has suffered only emotional distress and no pecuniary loss would not recover for negligence. However, courts have recently allowed recovery for a plaintiff to recover for purely emotional distress under certain circumstances. The state courts of California allowed recovery for emotional distress alone - even in the absence of any physical injury, when the defendant physically injures a relative of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff witnesses it. [35]

The eggshell skull rule is a legal doctrine upheld in some tort law systems, which holds that a tortfeasor is liable for the full extent of damage caused, even where the extent of the damage is due to the unforeseen frailty of the claimant. The eggshell skull rule was recently maintained in Australia in the case of Kavanagh v Akhtar. [32]

Damages place a monetary value on the harm done, following the principle of restitutio in integrum (Latin for "restoration to the original condition"). Thus, for most purposes connected with the quantification of damages, the degree of culpability in the breach of the duty of care is irrelevant. Once the breach of the duty is established, the only requirement is to compensate the victim.

One of the main tests that is posed when deliberating whether a claimant is entitled to compensation for a tort, is the "reasonable person". [36] The test is self-explanatory: would a reasonable person (as determined by a judge or jury), under the given circumstances, have done what the defendant did to cause the injury in question or, in other words, would a reasonable person, acting reasonably, have engaged in similar conduct when compared to the one whose actions caused the injury in question? Simple as the "reasonable person" test sounds, it is very complicated. It is a risky test because it involves the opinion of either the judge or the jury that can be based on limited facts. However, as vague as the "reasonable person" test seems, it is extremely important in deciding whether or not a plaintiff is entitled to compensation for a tort negligence.

Damages are compensatory in nature. Compensatory damages addresses a plaintiff / claimant's losses (in cases involving physical or mental injury the amount awarded also compensates for pain and suffering). The award should make the plaintiff whole, sufficient to put the plaintiff back in the position he or she was before Defendant's negligent act. Anything more would unlawfully allow a plaintiff to profit from the tort.

There are also two other general principles relating to damages. Firstly, the award of damages should take place in the form of a single lump sum payment. Therefore, a defendant should not be required to make periodic payments (however some statutes give exceptions for this). Secondly, the Court is not concerned with how the plaintiff uses the award of damages. For example, if a plaintiff is awarded $ 100,000 for physical harm, the plaintiff is not required to spend this money on medical bills to restore them to their original position - they can spend this money any way they want. [37]

    - quantifiable dollar losses suffered from the date of defendant's negligent act (the tort) up to a specified time (proven at trial). Special damage examples include lost wages, medical bills, and damage to property such as one's car. - these are damages that are not quantified in monetary terms (e.g., there’s no invoice or receipt as there would be to prove special damages). A general damage example is an amount for the pain and suffering one experiences from a car collision. Lastly, where the plaintiff proves only minimal loss or damage, or the court or jury is unable to quantify the losses, the court or jury may award nominal damages. - Punitive damages are to punish a defendant, rather than to compensate plaintiffs, in negligence cases. In most jurisdictions punitive damages are recoverable in a negligence action, but only if the plaintiff shows that the defendant’s conduct was more than ordinary negligence (i.e., wanton and willful or reckless).
  • Aggravated damages - In contrast to exemplary damages, compensation are given to the plaintiff when the harm is aggravated by the defendant's conduct. For example, the manner of this wrongful act increased the injury by subjecting the plaintiff to humiliation, insult. [38]

The United States generally recognizes four elements to a negligence action: duty, breach, proximate causation and injury. [39] A plaintiff who makes a negligence claim must prove all four elements of negligence in order to win his or her case. [40] Therefore, if it is highly unlikely that the plaintiff can prove one of the elements, the defendant may request judicial resolution early on, to prevent the case from going to a jury. This can be by way of a demurrer, motion to dismiss, or motion for summary judgment. [41]

The elements allow a defendant to test a plaintiff's accusations before trial, as well as providing a guide to the finder of fact at trial (the judge in a bench trial, or jury in a jury trial) to decide whether the defendant is or is not liable. Whether the case is resolved with or without trial again depends heavily on the particular facts of the case, and the ability of the parties to frame the issues to the court. The duty and causation elements in particular give the court the greatest opportunity to take the case from the jury, because they directly involve questions of policy. [42] The court can find that regardless of any disputed facts, the case may be resolved as a matter of law from undisputed facts because as a matter of law the defendant cannot be legally responsible for the plaintiff's injury under a theory of negligence. [42]

On appeal, depending on the disposition of the case and the question on appeal, the court reviewing a trial court's determination that the defendant was negligent will analyze at least one of the elements of the cause of action to determine if it is properly supported by the facts and law. For example, in an appeal from a final judgment after a jury verdict, the appellate court will review the record to verify that the jury was properly instructed on each contested element, and that the record shows sufficient evidence for the jury's findings. On an appeal from a dismissal or judgment against the plaintiff without trial, the court will review again whether the court below properly found that the plaintiff could not prove any or all of his or her case. [43]

Res Ipsa Loquitor Latin for "it speaks for itself." To prove negligence under this doctrine the plaintiff must prove (1) the incident does not usually happen without negligence (2) the object that caused the harm was under the defendants control (3) the plaintiff did not contribute to the cause. [44]

Negligence Per Se comes down to whether or not a party violated a standard in law meant to protect the public such as a building code or speed limit. [45]


Topic Tifa or Aerith: the real choice of Cloud (and yours) - Page 576

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 09:10:21:
The anti just realized that Cloud & aggravates false memories?
Yet he is wrong many times:

For example when he says & aggravates Barret, Reno and President Shinra that he was 1st class.
When he tells Biggs that the & eacutep & eacutee has always been with him, when he tells Tifa they saw each other 5 years ago.
He is also wrong in his dream, with his m & egravere, ll has a 1st class outfit.

For Zack's gesture, it's the same, we know he has always copied his gestures and confidence.
C & rsquo & eacutetait d & eacutej & agrave in the original game and in the Ultimania.

They say they love the game but, do they just understand that?

And let's move on to the fact that the Ultimania are wrong when they say that Cloud and Tifa are always loved, but all the worse, are they cannons?
You should know.

Stop reversing the clocks, it's the Cloti who were happy to see that Tifa doesn't ignore Cloud when they were having children. While the Cleriths had theorized for a while that it was a false memory (ost + no pain of cr & acircne). So no need to bring out a small list now we are all aware, we are talking about this sc & egravene in particular

The ultimatums say that Tifa and Cloud loved each other, in the past

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 09:18:28:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 08:41:37:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 21:33:26:
As usual, it is just the cleriths who tell lies and invent translations.

We can wait for the book to come out and buy it before we blindly believe the clerith blogs.

For one thing, both facts are true. Of the two, I don't remember supporting the second point, but the first because I'm talking about the scene during which Cloud believes that Tifa is calling him when in fact she doesn't know him.

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 21:50:37:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 21:45:30:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 21:03:27:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 20:57:28:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 20:45:15:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 20:00:43:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 17:59:33:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 15:52:42:

Voil & agrave.

Know that the Cloti do not try to put you in PLS dear Clerith.
Square does it for us.


Ah really

According to Nojima, this moment is not a Cloti moment because Aerith was present to treat them.
Suddenly I ask the question, do we have a closed moment in all Advent Children?
It would only be a moment like & ccedila:

Because if the end worsens, Tifa and Cloud have an exchange of views, Aerith has one with CLoud that leaves more emotions.

Vachement
I don't see Aerith & ecirctre happy to see the Cloud, nor Cloud & ecirctre happy to see Aerith.
Ni m & ecircme & eacutemue.
C & rsquoest not kind & laquo O you m & rsquoas so missed & eacute quickly let's take ourselves in our arms & raquo.

Non.
I see Cloud and Aerith back & aggravate back.
Cloud who lowers the t & ecircte because he feels guilty and Aerith who swings him a & laquo why t & rsquoes came & raquo.
Super

Just in case you don't catch the romantic difference

And what is it that you have written? She is derri & egravere all sc & egravenes & raquo?
Not because basically she didn't have to be in the movie so I find it funny

The c & acirclin which is a colli & eacute coll & eacute of that between Tifa and Barret of apr & egraves les d & eacuteveloppeurs

And also, the new ultimania super Clerith:

https://twitter.com/Cloud xAer ith / status / 1400050866309275649

The c & acirclin is not & laquo a copy of Barret & raquo Cloud saw Tifa cry and he wants to comfort her too.
There was a great difference between the two.

You need to be careful not to overdo it.

For your link, we did not accept.

What exactly is the difference? If Barret and Tifa have a family relationship (which many people think, including me and CTs) then why isn't the c & acirclin between Cloud and Tifa equally platonic?

Don't you see the difference?
S & eacuterieusement?
Barret barely touches it as Cloud serves it so hard that it literally crushes him.
Barret & ccedila lasts half a second.
Cloud and Tifa have been in each other's arms for a long time.
Cloud slips his t & ecircte into Tifa's blow.
It is very close to the school.
C & rsquoest tr & egraves personal like c & acirclin, nothing & agrave see with a c & acirclin of type family.
Do you do it with your m & egravere or your s & oeligur?
If so, you should consult.

And what good is a tweet that doesn't even translate the text?

What is the point of showing a text so vague that no one can verify the translation?

It speaks of Tifa yes, except that what & ccedila says is:
- that Tifa's small Cloud memory was false (so people who thought Tifa was trying to talk to Cloud were wrong)

So would Cloud expect Tifa to notice him and create false memories about him?
Yes, he is known to be aggravated, as are his false memories, or he pretends to be a soldier capable of keeping his promise.
And then?

- and that Cloud who gives the flower & agrave Tifa & eacuteta was currently acting like Zack & agrave this time l & agrave (so the opposite of the CT shippers who said that Cloud & eacutetait r & eacuteel with Tifa and Zack with Aerith).

It's not the Cloti who say Cloud is really him with Tifa.
C & rsquoest Nojima.
And I'd rather believe him than believe a Twitter account called CloudxAerith.

Just as I pr & eacutef & egravere believe when they say in Ultimania that Cloud flirts with Tifa.

Bah if people know Japanese they can actually read it (this is what the Japanese do, the Japanese Cloti also talk about their c & ocirct & eacute)

Not at all, the Cloti on twitter & eacutetaient all in fashion & quot look how the Clerith were wrong, Tifa always liked & eacute Cloud she tried to talk to him since they & eacutetaient children & quot except now we know it's wrong. So the "theory" (since they didn't even treat it as a theory) that it was Cloud who didn't know Tifa is wrong.

Bah I'm waiting for the link then. And & ccedila does what twitter is called CloudxAerith? Not everyone lies for a ship.

You should check on twitter with the advanced search, the Cloti themselves said that it was wrong and therefore corrected the person who shared this false translation.

On Twitter the Japanese I am say the translation is wrong, that it was marked that Tifa was unaware / had not noticed Cloud.

This is not something new, since it is something that has been known since the 1997 game.
This doesn't mean that Cloud didn't ignore Tifa in this scene, just that Tifa didn't know that he wanted to be friends with them, and when you see how he behaves, it's kind of normal that she doesn't know.

Eh no, still plant & eacute. You should check what you read on twitter. It's not Japanese Cloti who tweeted, it's English speakers who didn't even understand the Japanese tweet they were quoting.
And no one said that Cloud was "not ignoring" Tifa, only that Tifa was said to be ignorant of Cloud. Contrary to what the Cloti used to say before (kind of a few days or weeks ago).

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 22:10:33:
It's not the cl & eacuterith that insisted that Cloud doesn't take himself for Zack, like what if he's cool with Aerith isn't because of Zack?

d & eacutebut of the game Zacloud
Apr & egraves the true Cloud lifestream.

adios & quotCloud likes Aerith & quot, he doesn't even know her
and the Zacloud kiffe Tifa also seen him dredge her

Oh no I think we lost all the fences l & agrave, they all went in a tr & eacutelire of troll because they have nothing & agrave to say

This part aggravates it for all those who are in fashion & quotbouhouhou the Clerith normally they say that Cloud is not Zack so why now they are kind they are happy that Cloud behaves like Zack & quot:
The Cleriths are the ones who have always insisted that Cloud did not WHAT Zack's behavior, he never had his memory or personality. He just "quoted" a new personality based on Zack and Tifa's false memories / hopes, which the Cleriths have always supported because it proves that Cloud is weaker with Tifa than with Aerith. While the Cloti who were trying to push the theory that there would be a part of Zack in the Cloud reacting in front of Aerith

In short, you are hilarious about the Clotis. Don't look for him

Thank you for confirming what & rsquoon has been saying since the beginning:

Aerith never knew the real Cloud.
The real Cloud never knew Aerith.

To refresh your memory, Nojima confirmed in the Ultimania of the Remake that when Cloud is with Tifa, the real one sometimes emerges.

The rest of the time, so that's the fake Cloud.
With Aerith he has also had strange answers / strange reactions.

And yet it was with Aerith that he was most "true". If one has to wait for the sc & egravene with the river & egravere of life for Cloud to be considered & eacute & eacute & quotr & eacuteel & quot bah Tifa did not experience it very long before the end of the game. And we are reminded one last time, that to have the HAHW (which is according to the Cloti the sc & egravene that confirms their ship) you have to dredge Tifa before it is & quotr & eacuteel & quot hein

Very bad translation, which invents words, into enl & egraveve and totally changes the meaning of others:
https://twitter.com/aitai kimochi / stat us / 1255553713260789760 / photo / 1

Cloud's reactions are "bizarre" with Aerith precisely because his v & eacuteritable stands out to him, the one who is not gentle with people and who is not cool.

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 09:42:23:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 09:24:08:

Aerith never knew the real Cloud.
The real Cloud never knew Aerith.

and yet this is the real Cloud that the r &qu sees first in AC, rallying in the & rsquoau del & agrave apologize & agrave Aerith. These are the same Cloud that has been dying for the past two years to the point of being annoyed (this is written in the ultimania)

He is more primed by Zack and his wife than by Aerith.
Aerith he did not even know her.

This joke, on the other hand, is not to be read. the only place he does not come to visit and flees is the city of the ancients, the grave where Aerith is dead. When he realizes that he is going to die, it is in his church that he goes. And & aggravates the end of the film it is & aggravates his search / that of his flowers that he goes. It's his flowers and pictures of his flowers that he puts everywhere in his room.

So at what point does it feel like it's getting worse by the death of Zack and his worsening, you really need to be in the middle of it getting hot and starting to get hot.

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 13:02:40:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 11:52:41:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 11:22:13:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 11:13:41:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 08:52:48:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 16:18:10:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 14:16:02:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 09:18:23:
Well Clotis you say that the game is a remake of the & rsquoOG, and that the story will not change otherwise & ccedila will make everything else incoh & eacuterent blah-blah-blah the groundhog.

Except it's just a REMAKE (something new) and not a REMASTER (A graphically improved version with no other changes whatsoever) lol AC COMPLETE for example is an AC Remake (New version) and not a remaster

If you really are right then explain to me what the hell the spinners and the guardian of destiny are doing here, and the other details that change radically in relation to & agrave the & rsquoOG or this sentence: & laquo the unknown journey will continue & raquo.

I listened to you who knew everything and were always right

So if I understand correctly what you are trying to tell us is that it is NECESSARY that the game is a REMAKE that MODIFIES the basic game, to be able to VALIDATE the hypotheses & egraveses of the & quotpro Aerith & quot

I see I see, int & eacuteressant int & eacuteressant, thank you for these pr & eacutecisions

I knew you would say it, you or someone else.

But do you see that I said it? I just told you the facts and I asked you a simple question, like you are unable to answer and you dodge on your way lol I know what your thing is to say but don't tell me what to do. , c & rsquoest of the manipulation and the ridiculous d & eacuteturnement m & ecircme coming from you and in addition you put the words in capital letters to well support your words, c & rsquoest even worse level manipulation c & rsquoest of the sublime t & rsquoes an artist mec

And you say I'm inint & eacuteressant & agrave read ect. c & rsquoest pas grave & ccedila me d & eacuterange pas j & rsquoai l & rsquohabitude c & rsquoest toujours pareil avec vous en expectant je suis peut- & ecirctre pas int & eacuteressant & agrave lire mais vous & ecirctes incapables d & rsquoapporter des & eacutel & wrong

There is so much salt in your message, & ccedila becomes indigestible.

Not to mention your "you" that makes no sense, as if the words of some were necessarily the words of others.

Dixit the guy who puts all the Cleriths in the same basket lol

Frankly, I thought you were a sharp and credible guy

And your answers are always perfect twists, You must write Mozinor's hidden secret,

I'm sure you see yourself as more

Ah yes the famous & quotmay you did it first & quot although I was just interpreting your message g & eacuten & eacuteraliste.
Otherwise thank you for your interest in me, although I have absolutely nothing to do with my work.

Always a nice slice of laughter to read you, especially when you do the victim in & quotvou verray & quot mode

You see j & rsquoarrive & agrave make you laugh then arr & ecircte d & rsquo & ecirctre also n & eacutegatif all the time

But s & rsquoil s & rsquoav & egravere qu & rsquoon is right, with the boulevard you took and what you believe put us in the t & ecircte the fall will be heavy lol

We will see with Intergrade of aggravation if there is anything new, hearing t & rsquoenflammes not too much when m & ecircme Flambi

& quoton & quot, & quotvous & quot. note if the multi-account history is true you are right to g & eacuten & eacuteralize.

You DDB and you take back my message what an irony

You have the right to scold us but when we rebel against this instant DDB, #WelcometoCuba

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 09:10:21:
The anti just realized that Cloud & aggravates false memories?
Yet he is wrong many times:

For example when he says & aggravates Barret, Reno and President Shinra that he was 1st class.
When he tells Biggs that the & eacutep & eacutee has always been with him, when he tells Tifa they saw each other 5 years ago.
He is also wrong in his dream, with his m & egravere, ll has a 1st class outfit.

For Zack's gesture, it's the same, we know he has always copied his gestures and confidence.
C & rsquo & eacutetait d & eacutej & agrave in the original game and in the Ultimania.

They say they love the game but, do they just understand that?

And let's move on to the fact that the Ultimania are wrong when they say that Cloud and Tifa are always loved, but all the worse, are they cannons?
You should know.

Stop reversing the clocks, it's the Cloti who were happy to see that Tifa doesn't ignore Cloud when they were having children. While the Cleriths had theorized for a while that it was a false memory (ost + no pain of cr & acircne).

Just when he thinks & aggravates that memory, he has no headache.

And the OST just came out so how could you know?
So you didn't know how to lie a little if you like it.

So no need to bring out a small list now we are all aware, we are talking about this sc & egravene in particular

The ultimatums say that Tifa and Cloud loved each other, in the past

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 09:18:28:

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 08:41:37:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 21:33:26:
As usual, it is just the cleriths who tell lies and invent translations.

We can wait for the book to come out and buy it before we blindly believe the clerith blogs.

For one thing, both facts are true. Of the two, I don't remember supporting the second point, but the first because I'm talking about the scene during which Cloud believes that Tifa is calling him when in fact she doesn't know him.

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 21:50:37:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 21:45:30:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 21:03:27:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 20:57:28:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 20:45:15:

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 20:00:43:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 17:59:33:

Le 02 juin 2021 & agrave 15:52:42:

Voil & agrave.

Know that the Cloti do not try to put you in PLS dear Clerith.
Square does it for us.


Ah really

According to Nojima, this moment is not a Cloti moment because Aerith was present to treat them.
Suddenly I ask the question, do we have a closed moment in all Advent Children?
It would only be a moment like & ccedila:

Because if the end worsens, Tifa and Cloud have an exchange of views, Aerith has one with CLoud that leaves more emotions.

Vachement
I don't see Aerith & ecirctre happy to see the Cloud, nor Cloud & ecirctre happy to see Aerith.
Ni m & ecircme & eacutemue.
C & rsquoest not kind & laquo O you m & rsquoas so missed & eacute quickly let's take ourselves in our arms & raquo.

Non.
I see Cloud and Aerith back & aggravate back.
Cloud who lowers the t & ecircte because he feels guilty and Aerith who swings him a & laquo why t & rsquoes came & raquo.
Super

Just in case you don't catch the romantic difference

And what is it that you have written? She is derri & egravere all sc & egravenes & raquo?
Not because basically she didn't have to be in the movie so I find it funny

The c & acirclin which is a colli & eacute coll & eacute of that between Tifa and Barret of apr & egraves les d & eacuteveloppeurs

And also, the new ultimania super Clerith:

https://twitter.com/Cloud xAer ith / status / 1400050866309275649

The c & acirclin is not & laquo a copy of Barret & raquo Cloud saw Tifa cry and he wants to comfort her too.
There was a great difference between the two.

You need to be careful not to overdo it.

For your link, we did not accept.

What exactly is the difference? If Barret and Tifa have a family relationship (which many people think, including me and CTs) then why isn't the c & acirclin between Cloud and Tifa equally platonic?

Don't you see the difference?
S & eacuterieusement?
Barret barely touches it as Cloud serves it so hard that it literally crushes him.
Barret & ccedila lasts half a second.
Cloud and Tifa have been in each other's arms for a long time.
Cloud slips his t & ecircte into Tifa's blow.
It is very close to the school.
C & rsquoest tr & egraves personal like c & acirclin, nothing & agrave see with a c & acirclin of type family.
Do you do it with your m & egravere or your s & oeligur?
If so, you should consult.

And what good is a tweet that doesn't even translate the text?

What is the point of showing a text so vague that no one can verify the translation?

It speaks of Tifa yes, except that what & ccedila says is:
- that Tifa's small Cloud memory was false (so people who thought Tifa was trying to talk to Cloud were wrong)

So would Cloud expect Tifa to notice him and create false memories about him?
Yes, he is known to be aggravated, as are his false memories, or he pretends to be a soldier capable of keeping his promise.
And then?

- and that Cloud who gives the flower & agrave Tifa & eacuteta was currently acting like Zack & agrave this time l & agrave (so the opposite of the CT shippers who said that Cloud & eacutetait r & eacuteel with Tifa and Zack with Aerith).

It's not the Cloti who say Cloud is really him with Tifa.
C & rsquoest Nojima.
And I'd rather believe him than believe a Twitter account called CloudxAerith.

Just as I pr & eacutef & egravere believe when they say in Ultimania that Cloud flirts with Tifa.

Bah if people know Japanese they can actually read it (this is what the Japanese do, the Japanese Cloti also talk about their c & ocirct & eacute)

Not at all, the Cloti on twitter & eacutetaient all in fashion & quot look how the Clerith were wrong, Tifa always liked & eacute Cloud she tried to talk to him since they & eacutetaient children & quot except now we know it's wrong. So the "theory" (since they didn't even treat it as a theory) that it was Cloud who didn't know Tifa is wrong.

Bah I'm waiting for the link then. And & ccedila does what twitter is called CloudxAerith? Not everyone lies for a ship.

You should check on twitter with the advanced search, the Cloti themselves said that it was wrong and therefore corrected the person who shared this false translation.

On Twitter the Japanese I am say the translation is wrong, that it was marked that Tifa was unaware / had not noticed Cloud.

This is not something new, since it is something that has been known since the 1997 game.
This doesn't mean that Cloud didn't ignore Tifa in this scene, just that Tifa didn't know that he wanted to be friends with them, and when you see how he behaves, it's kind of normal that she doesn't know.

Eh no, still plant & eacute. You should check what you read on twitter. It's not Japanese Cloti who tweeted, it's English speakers who didn't even understand the Japanese tweet they were quoting.
And no one said that Cloud was "not ignoring" Tifa, only that Tifa was said to be ignorant of Cloud. Contrary to what the Cloti used to say before (kind of a few days or weeks ago).

June 2, 2021 & aggravates 22:10:33:
It's not the cl & eacuterith that insisted that Cloud doesn't take himself for Zack, like what if he's cool with Aerith isn't because of Zack?

d & eacutebut of the game Zacloud
Apr & egraves the true Cloud lifestream.

adios & quotCloud likes Aerith & quot, he doesn't even know her
and the Zacloud kiffe Tifa also seen him dredge her

Oh no I think we lost all the fences l & agrave, they all went in a tr & eacutelire of troll because they have nothing & agrave to say

This part aggravates it for all those who are in fashion & quotbouhouhou the Clerith normally they say that Cloud is not Zack so why now they are kind they are happy that Cloud behaves like Zack & quot:
The Cleriths are the ones who have always insisted that Cloud did not WHAT Zack's behavior, he never had his memory or personality. He just "quoted" a new personality based on Zack and Tifa's false memories / hopes, which the Cleriths have always supported because it proves that Cloud is weaker with Tifa than with Aerith. While the Cloti who were trying to push the theory that there would be a part of Zack in the Cloud reacting in front of Aerith

In short, you are hilarious about the Clotis. Don't look for him

Thank you for confirming what & rsquoon has been saying since the beginning:

Aerith never knew the real Cloud.
The real Cloud never knew Aerith.

To refresh your memory, Nojima confirmed in the Ultimania of the Remake that when Cloud is with Tifa, the real one sometimes emerges.

The rest of the time, so that's the fake Cloud.
With Aerith he has also had strange answers / strange reactions.

And yet it was with Aerith that he was most "true".

If one has to wait for the sc & egravene with the river & egravere of life for Cloud to be considered & eacute & eacute & quotr & eacuteel & quot bah Tifa did not experience it very long before the end of the game. And we are reminded one last time, that to have the HAHW (which is according to the Cloti the sc & egravene that confirms their ship) you have to dredge Tifa before it is & quotr & eacuteel & quot hein

Very bad translation, which invents words, into enl & egraveve and totally changes the meaning of others:
https://twitter.com/aitai kimochi / stat us / 1255553713260789760 / photo / 1

Cloud's reactions are "bizarre" with Aerith precisely because his v & eacuteritable stands out to him, the one who is not gentle with people and who is not cool.

I think you must have missed a lot of messages.

Because it aggravates the former to say that Cloud has nothing to do with Zack, it's the clerith.
The Cloti, it has always been said that before the Lifestream, Cloud is not really him.

For the message you say is mistranslated and well, I tell you, buy the ulimania and you will see for yourself.
Cloud is a Soldier with Aerith, he is not the real Cloud.
That is a fact.
And the true personality of Cloud is sometimes seen with Tifa.

Like in his room for example.

For the translation you put in, several Japanese have already proven that Audrey was very wrong in her translations.
She is not a pro and she makes a lot of grammar mistakes.

Like when she said that Cloud can't get away from Aerith, when the real deal is Cloud is overwhelmed by Aerith's familiarity and wants to push her away.

What rebellion? you post & eacutes but everyone cares about what you say at least sometimes Dftlink can come out of int & eacuteressans stuff you pin yourself on insignificant stuff, change nothing such an opposition is that happiness

What's funny is that their official & quotsource & quot is either a clerith who puts blurry images and invents translations.
Or Audrey, a blogger, who makes mistakes in her translations and doesn't like Tifa to the point of saying that Rude isn't crush on her, but that he's in love with R & eacuteno.
While Rude prevents R & eacuteno from shooting Tifa.

But as a matter of fact, the ultimania who say everywhere that Cloud and Tifa have confessed their feelings, they are wrong.

Bah reread my message because that's exactly what I said:
& quot (ost + no cr & acircne pain) & quot
And it's hard to tell, but the names of the OSTs have been out for a while, even for several months now. We do not all lie as I said more t & ocirct

Needless to say, the only difference (which is normal) on this point between Clerith and Cloti is that the Cloti did not stop spreading the idea that Cloud was supposedly possessed by Zack sometimes (with Aerith eh) and that he had his memories. While the Cleriths say that Cloud is copying Zack's behavior while having a totally different personality and that he doesn't have his memories but it's imagining his place at certain events. So don't force me to go out with all this evidence because believe me it's not that hard to find enough to see how many of you still act as if the time Cloud and Aerith had spent together was insignificant. because he had identity problems

Still unresolved but no, it aggravates the image you shared is not about soldier and it is not about "true personality" all it says is that Cloud is acting more naturally with Tifa. As one would do with friends or family. While with Aerith he tries far too hard to look cool and ends up looking awkward.

Yes Audrey doesn't do perfect translations, but on the other hand you are completely aggravated by the plate, eh. It turns out you don't know Japanese at all.
Audrey shared the sentence in Japanese precisely:
What you just came up with is just an overinterpretation (vaguely exaggerated and aggravates the limit of parody) of the sentence by Cloti who can't accept the fact that Cloud can only learn Aerith.

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 14:40:11:
What's funny is that their official & quotsource & quot is either a clerith who puts blurry images and invents translations.
Or Audrey, a blogger, who makes mistakes in her translations and doesn't like Tifa to the point of saying that Rude isn't crush on her, but that he's in love with R & eacuteno.
While Rude prevents R & eacuteno from shooting Tifa.

But as a matter of fact, the ultimania who say everywhere that Cloud and Tifa have confessed their feelings, they are wrong.

Is that why the Japanese CTs are talking about it?
But well suuuuur, because we don't like Tifa we don't like her? Audrey is just a shipper from Rude and Reno who hopes that Rude will like Reno more than Rude this time.

& quotEverywhere & quot it is beautiful to r & ecircver. They only talk about HAHW once, eh, but & ccedila is taboo

Le 03 juin 2021 & agrave 14:56:26:
Bah reread my message because that's exactly what I said:
& quot (ost + no cr & acircne pain) & quot
And it's hard to tell, but the names of the OSTs have been out for a while, even for several months now. We do not all lie as I said more t & ocirct

Needless to say, the only difference (which is normal) on this point between Clerith and Cloti is that the Cloti did not stop spreading the idea that Cloud was supposedly possessed by Zack sometimes (with Aerith eh) and that he had his memories. While the Cleriths say that Cloud is copying Zack's behavior while having a totally different personality and that he doesn't have his memories but it's imagining his place at certain events. So don't force me to go out with all this evidence because believe me it's not that hard to find enough to see how many of you still act as if the time Cloud and Aerith had spent together was insignificant. because he had identity problems

Still unresolved but no, it aggravates the image you shared is not about soldier and it is not about "true personality" all it says is that Cloud is acting more naturally with Tifa. As one would do with friends or family. While with Aerith he tries far too hard to look cool and ends up looking awkward.

Yes Audrey doesn't do perfect translations, but on the other hand you are completely aggravated by the plate, eh. It turns out you don't know Japanese at all.
Audrey shared the sentence in Japanese precisely:
What you just came up with is just an overinterpretation (vaguely exaggerated and aggravates the limit of parody) of the sentence by Cloti who can't accept the fact that Cloud can only learn Aerith.

You know that since the beginning, Cloud has been said to be "playing it safe" by copying Zack's eccentric face, so if you agree with him, how is the news of Cloud trying to is playing it cool by dragging Tifa is a novelty?

Similarly for the mistakes Cloud makes with his memories.
Did you play the game?
Because hey, he makes a lot of mistakes all the time.
Tifa reacted and surprised me when he was wrong.
It is the only & aggravates the knowledge by the way.

So it would be time to wake up the clerith.
It is not as if it was said when the utimania Omega

And Audrey & agrave makes a lot of mistakes and oddly always in favor of the clerith.
For a moment & ccedila finally saw each other.

Since you seem to think I'm lying, look at yourself

(Ultimania p745)


Video: IALL 61 Et si vous naviez pas tort davoir choisi la vie que vous avez (January 2022).